Do you opt for a single, comprehensive software platform, or should you integrate several specialized solutions? Both approaches have their advantages and challenges, and the decision can have a significant impact on efficiency and cost-effectiveness. So what are the pros and cons of software integrations versus the use of fewer platforms?

The Rise of Software Integrations

Software integrations are the process of connecting multiple software solutions to share data and work together seamlessly. In facility management, this could mean integrating a computerized maintenance management system (CMMS) with a building management system (BMS), energy management software, and other specialized tools.

On the surface, this sounds ideal: integrating best-in-class solutions tailored to different aspects of facility management to create a robust ecosystem. However, as with any technology decision, integrations come with their own set of challenges, and they are not always the right choice for every facility.

Upside

1. Best-of-Breed Solutions

One of the most compelling arguments for integrating different software platforms is the ability to select best-in-breed solutions. Instead of settling for an all-in-one platform that might excel in one area but underperform in another, software integrations allow facility managers to pick the best tool for each specific function.

For example, a CMMS may be great at tracking work orders and preventive maintenance, while an energy management platform excels at monitoring energy usage and identifying cost-saving opportunities. By integrating the two, you can leverage the strengths of each tool without compromising.

2. Flexibility and Scalability

Facility needs often evolve over time. An integration approach allows you to scale your software ecosystem as those needs grow. You can add new platforms as necessary without having to overhaul the entire system. This flexibility ensures that your facility’s software can adapt to new challenges, such as regulatory changes, new sustainability goals, or expansion of operations.

3. Increased Efficiency

When done right, software integrations streamline data flow between systems, eliminating manual data entry and reducing the risk of errors. For example, integrating a rounding tool with a CMMS ensures that asset data is automatically updated  on schedule and work orders are generated based on real-time equipment performance. This real-time sharing of data can improve decision-making and optimize operations across the facility.

4. Data-Driven Insights

By integrating multiple platforms, facility managers can gain deeper insights by pulling data from different sources.. With the right integrations, you can track energy usage, maintenance schedules, occupancy levels, and compliance metrics in one place, giving you a more holistic view of your facility’s performance. These insights can drive proactive decision-making and long-term strategic planning.

Downside

1. Complexity and Maintenance

One of the biggest drawbacks of software integrations is the complexity involved. Integrating multiple systems often requires expensive, custom APIs, middleware, and a significant amount of configuration to ensure smooth communication between platforms. This can become particularly challenging when dealing with legacy systems that weren’t designed for integration.

Once the systems are integrated, ongoing maintenance is required to ensure everything continues to function as expected. Software updates, compatibility issues, and changes in one platform can have a ripple effect, causing disruptions across the integrated ecosystem.

2. Higher Costs

Integrating multiple platforms can be expensive—not just upfront, but over time. Custom integrations often come with implementation fees, and hiring or contracting IT professionals to manage these integrations can increase your operational costs. Additionally, software vendors may charge for access to their APIs or for data storage, which can add to the overall expense.

Compared to using a single software platform that covers most of your needs, the ongoing costs of maintaining integrated systems can be significantly higher. Facility managers should weigh these expenses against the potential benefits to determine whether the added functionality is worth the investment.

3. Potential for Data Silos

Although the goal of integration is to unify data across platforms, it doesn’t always work out perfectly. Inconsistent or incomplete integrations can lead to data silos, where information remains locked in one system and is inaccessible to others. If data is not the same between systems, then you also run the risk of not only data silos but inaccurate information. This can reduce the efficiency gains you were hoping to achieve and even create compliance risks if critical information isn’t shared correctly between systems.

4. Vendor Dependency and Integration Fragility

Relying on multiple software platforms means relying on multiple vendors. Each vendor will have its own update schedule, customer support, and pricing model. This can lead to fragmentation and uncertainty when one vendor changes its API, goes out of business, or introduces a new feature that disrupts your integrations.

Additionally, integrations are often fragile. A small change in one platform—like a new field or an updated user interface—can break the integration, requiring swift intervention to fix it. This can lead to downtime, frustrated employees, and lost productivity.

The Case for Fewer Platforms: Simplicity, Cost Savings, and Efficiency

Given the potential downsides of software integrations, many facility managers opt for an all-in-one platform or a minimal number of software tools. This approach has its own set of advantages, especially for smaller facilities or teams with limited IT support.

1. Lower Costs

Using a single software platform typically comes with a lower total cost of ownership compared to integrating multiple solutions. There are fewer licensing fees, fewer implementation costs, and reduced need for IT expertise to manage and maintain the software. Additionally, most all-in-one platforms are designed to scale, which allows you to expand without the headache of managing new integrations.

2. Simplicity and Ease of Use

One of the biggest advantages of using fewer platforms is simplicity. With fewer systems to manage, there’s less complexity, less training required for staff, and less risk of something going wrong. Facility managers can focus on their core responsibilities rather than dealing with technical issues, ensuring smoother day-to-day operations.

3. Single Source of Truth

A single platform creates a unified source of truth, with all data stored in one place. This reduces the risk of data silos, ensures data consistency, and simplifies reporting. With one platform, you don’t have to worry about syncing data across systems or reconciling discrepancies between different tools.

4. Integrated Compliance and Reporting

For facility managers who need to stay compliant with health and safety regulations, environmental standards, and other industry-specific rules, using fewer platforms can simplify compliance reporting. Many comprehensive facility management software platforms come with built-in reporting tools that make it easier to track and submit necessary documentation.

Choosing the Right Approach for Your Facility

Deciding between software integrations and a single platform isn’t a one-size-fits-all decision. The choice depends on your facility’s size, complexity, and unique needs. If you require highly specialized functionality, integrating best-of-breed solutions may be worth the added complexity and cost. However, if simplicity, cost control, and ease of use are your top priorities especially across multiple connected facilities, opting for fewer platforms could provide a more efficient and manageable solution.

Regardless of which approach you choose, it’s crucial to assess your current and future needs, work with trusted vendors, and ensure that your software solutions align with your operational goals.

‍